There is no credible historical or biblical evidence that Simon Peter was ever in Glastonbury with St. Clement. This story is based entirely on medieval myths and later traditions that are not supported by early church records or archaeology.
Here is a breakdown of the origins and inaccuracies of this legend:
Biblical and early Christian records: The New Testament and other early Christian writings contain no mention of Simon Peter traveling to Britain. Accounts from the 1st and 2nd centuries place Peter’s ministry in the Middle East and, eventually, in Rome, where tradition holds he was martyred during the reign of Emperor Nero.
Glastonbury’s fabricated origins: The legends of Glastonbury were largely developed by monks at Glastonbury Abbey in the 12th century to boost the prestige of their monastery. To solidify the abbey’s claim as the oldest Christian foundation in Britain, they created tales linking it directly to the apostles and the earliest period of Christianity.
Joseph of Arimathea’s role: The main figure in the Glastonbury founding myth is Joseph of Arimathea, not Simon Peter. In these legends, Joseph is said to have traveled to England and built the first church at Glastonbury. This story was further embellished over time, sometimes including the Holy Grail.
The supposed St. Clement connection: Legends also later connected other early Christian figures to these myths. While Clement of Rome (c. 35–99 AD) was an important early church leader, there are no historical sources placing him in Britain. The idea of him traveling to Glastonbury with Peter is a fabrication, likely introduced to give the story an even older, more “apostolic” pedigree.
Archaeological findings: Archaeological excavations at Glastonbury have found evidence of an Anglo-Saxon monastery from the late 7th century, preceded by a high-status settlement in the 5th and 6th centuries with eastern Mediterranean trade connections. However, no archaeological evidence supports the existence of a church or settlement founded by Joseph of Arimathea or Peter in the 1st century.
In summary, the story of Simon Peter and St. Clement in Glastonbury is a legendary embellishment created by medieval monastics and is not considered historically factual by scholars. (Google)

You see how things are FABRICATED, through the history of the church? An unsuspecting person would be compelled to believe that since Clements was given the rule over the church by St. Peter, the Roman version of Christianity is what Jesus would want and would “SERVE THE LIGHT!” (It is part of the Demiurge’s TRAP!)

They connect your ENERGY EXCHANGE CENTERS to the DIVJNE ENERGY in more than one DIETY!

Supercharge the servants of the church, but in effect, just working a CYCLE of labors out of them and back through the cycle of REINCARNATION!(that the same church made disapear)

Here at THREEOAKS1.COM we go past that and SERVING LIGHT, we will goal achieving the GREATEST SPIRITUAL ACCOMPLISHMENT…together! ❤️

“ESCAPE THE CYCLE OF

             REINCARNATION!”

“Who ELSE SHOULD..

        “SAVE’ YOU BUT

                              ME?

    For I AM “THE LIGHT!”

     (So, enlightened beings ESCAPE

                     THE CYCLE!)

Tertullian was already serving ROMAN CHRISTIANITY when he wrote about Clements being ordained by St. Peter, who was never placed in Britain by historians or the bible!

Well, if it were so, Simon Peter would be handing authenticity to a Roman church, and in doing so, he would be implementing a PRE-FAILED message.  If Rabinical law says ,”no person is responsible for the law if even ONE LETTER, not be kept by RABINICALS,” then the law in that church system is already DEAD, after that a wise person might ask themselves, “if I am not responsible for LAWS that are not kept, since ONE LETTER obviously has not been kept by rabinicals, nor has the INSTRUCTIONS AND MANDITORYS that get projected by the church as THREAT OF MY ETERNITY, so WHY WOULD I BE RESPONSIBLE for those even?

You see where giving AUTHENTICITY to the church by having Simon Peter ordain ST CLEMENTS, when there is NO HISTORIC EVIDENCE of Peter ever being in Britain! (the UNSUSPEFTING will assure one another that they KNOW what “THEY DO NOT KNOW!” (which allows CONTROLS to be uttered from ROME!)